Saturday, 6 February 2010
Demise of waterfall, concept or reality?
Agile development approach has been the most adopted methodology for 21st century development, and software project management. "Some have said that 2007 was the year that Agile arrived, with agile development best practices such as automated builds, test automation, and continuous integration finally beginning to reach critical mass among Java developers. While this is true in theory, the fact is that most Java enterprise projects are still based on more traditional development methods, such as the Waterfall model".
Take Scrum for instance, we know a strongly modelled scrum is a projects that are "divided into succinct work cadences, known as sprints, which are typically one week, two weeks, or three weeks in duration. At the end of each sprint, stakeholders and team members meet to assess the progress of a project and plan its next steps".
Isn’t this what developers and stakeholders has conceptually been practicing since the prime times of waterfall, which many believe is at its demise. At each stage of the waterfall model is a well iterative concept (such as Scrum) adopted to make sure before we proceed to the next stage of the development process, deliverables would have been well designed, coded and well tested.
Waterfall methodology is still utilised in today’s software development, practically because – each stage of the development process is an adopted agile process interactively and iteratively utilised to derive a quality working product. One might argue, but waterfall never iterates the actual project, simply because water flows downwards and ends there.
When a project exit the deadline, it has exited the deadline - any subsequent call for modification triggers a call for design changes, code modification, testing and walkthrough and modification of documentations and re-implementation. This put together is water pouring from one glass to another.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment